News · Rules & courts

nexfibre shareholders reject submitting remedies in UK CMA broadband merger inquiry

Shareholders in nexfibre refused to propose behavioral remedies in response to the UK Competition and Markets Authority's provisional finding that its £2bn purchase of Substantial lessens broadband competition.

£2bn

broadband merger remedies rejected by nexfibre shareholders in UK CMA review

Grade 1 · Primary

Source: Competition and Markets Authority

What changed
Shareholders in nexfibre formally rejected proposing behavioral remedies to address the UK Competition and Markets Authority's provisional finding that its Substantial acquisition harms competition.
Who it counts
Liberty Global, Telefónica, InfraVia, and UK wholesale full-fibre broadband networks including Netomnia, Brsk, and YouFibre.
What it does not tell you
The decision leaves the regulator weighing structural remedies or outright prohibition ahead of its final statutory decision deadline in December.

The full story Check the source

Shareholders in wholesale broadband venture nexfibre confirmed on 21 October 2026 that they will not submit a remedies package to resolve antitrust objections to their planned £2bn purchase of Substantial [1].

The move follows the UK Competition and Markets Authority's provisional finding that combining nexfibre with Substantial—which owns alternative networks Netomnia and Brsk—would substantially lessen competition in wholesale fixed-line broadband [1]. The CMA had identified outright prohibition as a primary prospective remedy [1].

Backers Liberty Global, Telefónica, and InfraVia argued that behavioral access commitments would be unworkable and disputed the CMA's assessment of alternative market consolidation scenarios [1].

What it measures

Phase 2 merger remedies and structural competition enforcement across the United Kingdom's alternative fibre-to-the-premises broadband infrastructure [1].

What it does not tell you

The refusal to offer remedies does not formally terminate the transaction, as the CMA Inquiry Group must still publish its final determination by 15 December 2026 [1].

Sources and their grades

  1. Competition and Markets Authority, Anticipated acquisition by nexfibre of Substantial — Notice of possible remedies. Read 22 October 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Notice of possible remedies under Rule 12 of the CMA rules of procedure for merger inquiry groups.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under Antitrust, Broadband, Competition, Mergers, Telecommunications, United Kingdom

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all