News · Security & privacy

Cisco says state-backed hackers and a ransomware group are exploiting its firewall management software

One flaw, scored 10 out of 10, gives root access without logging in. Cisco's researchers found a variant of malware previously attributed to Russia's Sandworm on one compromised system.

Catching up: the original came out on . This story was published later, when the site opened.

Cisco's firewall management software is being exploited by state and criminal hackers

Grade 3 · Filed record

Source: Cisco Talos

What changed
Cisco's Talos researchers reported three groups exploiting flaws in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center; CISA listed the top flaw as exploited the same day.
Who it affects
Organisations running Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center without the fixes Cisco released for CVE-2026-20079 and CVE-2026-20316.
What it does not tell you
How many organisations were breached, or which. And the attributions to state and criminal groups are Cisco's own assessment.

The full story Check the source

Cisco's security research team, Talos, said on 9 September that it is tracking the exploitation of two flaws in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center by state-sponsored and criminal groups [1].

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency listed the more serious flaw, CVE-2026-20079, as exploited the same day, giving federal agencies until 12 September [2].

That flaw lets an unauthenticated, remote attacker bypass authentication and run scripts with root access. It has been known since March, and Cisco scores it 10 out of 10 [3].

What it covers

Unpatched Firewall Management Center systems, which manage Cisco firewalls. The second flaw, CVE-2026-20316, lets an attacker log in with a low-privileged account [1].

Talos describes three clusters of attacks [1]:

  • one that planted web shells and stole credentials;
  • one it links to a state-sponsored group whose tools overlap with Russia's Sandworm, which installed a variant of the Cyclops Blink malware;
  • one it assesses with high confidence to be a ransomware operator, whose methods matched Qilin ransomware affiliates.

Cisco advised customers to apply the fixes it had already released, and said a fuller hardening release would follow the week of 14 September [1].

What it does not tell you

How many organisations were breached, or which ones. The post gives technical indicators, not victims [1].

Who is behind the attacks, beyond Talos's own assessment [1].

Sources and their grades

  1. Cisco Talos, Active exploitation of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vulnerabilities. Read 29 September 2026. Grade 3 · Filed record Published 9 September 2026. Cisco's research arm on attacks against Cisco's own product; who is behind them is Talos's assessment, not independently confirmed.
  2. US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, entry CVE-2026-20079. Read 29 September 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Added 9 September 2026, due 12 September for US federal agencies.
  3. US National Vulnerability Database (NIST), CVE-2026-20079. Read 29 September 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Published 4 March 2026; scored 10.0 by Cisco.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under Cyberattacks, Network security, Vulnerabilities

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all