News · Rules & courts

China takes an AI app offline for not labelling AI-generated content, among 10 enforcement cases

The internet regulator also fined a hospital left with 700 unpatched vulnerabilities, and a property firm that collected over 5,000 customers' faces without consent.

Catching up: the original came out on . This story was published later, when the site opened.

China shuts an AI mini-program that failed to label AI-generated content

Grade 1 · Primary

Source: Cyberspace Administration of China

What changed
China's internet regulator published 10 enforcement cases, including a mini-program ordered offline for not labelling AI-generated text and images.
Who it affects
Ten companies and one hospital in China, penalised by local offices of the Cyberspace Administration under its security, data and AI rules.
What it does not tell you
The size of the fines, or the companies' names. The regulator describes each case but names none, and gives no amounts.

The full story Check the source

China's internet regulator ordered a mini-program offline because it did not label AI-generated content, one of 10 enforcement cases it published on 15 September [1].

The app, run inside WeChat by a company in Sichuan, offered AI chat and image generation. It added no visible labels, no hidden labels in file metadata, and no labels on exported content, the Cyberspace Administration of China said [1].

A company in Jiangsu was warned for running two "API relay" websites that passed users' requests to several large AI models without the required security assessment [1].

What it covers

The other eight cases are about security and personal data. Among them [1]:

  • a hospital in Henan whose firewalls and other security tools had stopped working when their licences expired, leaving 700 vulnerabilities, 73 of them high-risk [1].
  • a Chongqing property company that collected over 5,000 customers' face images without separate consent [1].
  • a Shanghai company that sent users' names, phone numbers, emails and passwords abroad without the required security assessment [1].
  • a company whose data-management system had over 2,400 internal documents stolen, through an open-source search engine with an unauthorised-access flaw [1].
  • a former employee who planted malicious code in an app with about 350,000 users [1].

What it does not tell you

How large the fines were, or who the companies are. The regulator describes the cases without naming them or giving amounts [1].

How often the AI labelling rules are enforced. These are cases the regulator chose to publish as examples [1].

Sources and their grades

  1. Cyberspace Administration of China, 国家网信办发布近期网络安全、数据安全、个人信息保护等领域执法典型案例 (The CAC publishes recent typical enforcement cases in network security, data security and personal information protection). Read 29 September 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Published 15 September 2026, 17:00 Beijing time, in Chinese; translations are ours.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under AI, China, Privacy, Regulation

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all