News · Internet & devices

China says platforms removed 1.56 million posts about companies and dealt with 26,000 accounts in a clean-up

The internet regulator's campaign targets what it calls malicious hype about businesses, from extortion to posts running down firms' prospects. It names accounts on Xiaohongshu, Douyin, Weibo and others.

Catching up: the original came out on . This story was published later, when the site opened.

1.56 million

posts about companies removed in China's campaign against 'malicious hype', it says

Grade 1 · Primary

Source: Cyberspace Administration of China

What changed
China's internet regulator said platforms removed more than 1.56 million items of information it says infringed on companies, and dealt with over 26,000 accounts.
Who it counts
Posts and accounts on Chinese platforms, counted by the regulator and platforms during a campaign on information about businesses.
What it does not tell you
How much was false, or how genuine criticism of companies was treated. The regulator decides what counts, and publishes totals only.

The full story Check the source

China's internet regulator said on 19 September that platforms had removed more than 1.56 million items of information it says infringed on companies, and dealt with more than 26,000 accounts [1].

The figures come from a campaign by the Cyberspace Administration of China against what it calls malicious hype about businesses [1].

The campaign targets accounts that smear companies, or compile and amplify negative information about them [1].

It also targets those seeking illegal gains "in the name of supervision", and posts that stir up conflict between groups of consumers [1].

What it covers

Accounts on Chinese platforms. The regulator's examples include [1]:

  • accounts on Xiaohongshu, Toutiao, Weibo and Sohu that posted negative claims about companies and then demanded "publicity fees" to remove them;
  • accounts on Toutiao, Bilibili and Weibo that spread false claims about companies' finances and product quality around new product launches;
  • accounts that repeatedly recirculated old negative news about companies and predicted their decline.

The accounts named were closed or otherwise dealt with, according to the regulator [1].

What it does not tell you

How many of the removed posts were false. The regulator publishes totals, not a breakdown, and it decides what counts as infringing [1].

How accurate criticism of companies is treated. The release does not distinguish it [1].

Sources and their grades

  1. Cyberspace Administration of China, "清朗·优化营商网络环境 整治恶意炒作涉企信息"专项行动公开曝光第二批典型案例 (Second batch of typical cases in the campaign against malicious hype of enterprise-related information). Read 29 September 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Published Saturday 19 September 2026, 09:00 Beijing time, in Chinese; translations are ours. The counts are the regulator's.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under China, Content moderation, Platforms

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all