News · Rules & courts

A US jury finds Apple infringed two vibration patents and awards Taction $5.72 billion

The jury in San Diego found the infringement was not willful and rejected Apple's claim that the patents are invalid. The verdict can still be challenged after trial and on appeal.

Catching up: the original came out on . This story was published later, when the site opened.

$5.72bn

in damages a US jury awarded Taction against Apple over two vibration patents

Grade 1 · Primary

Source: US District Court for the Southern District of California

What changed
On 25 September a federal jury found Apple infringed three claims in two Taction Technology patents and awarded $5,721,961,750 in damages.
Who it counts
Apple, and two Taction patents on vibration modules that create tactile sensations, the technology behind haptic feedback.
What it does not tell you
Which Apple products, or what Apple will finally pay. The verdict form names neither, and post-trial motions and an appeal can change the amount.

The full story Check the source

A federal jury in San Diego found on 25 September that Apple infringed patents held by Taction Technology, and awarded Taction $5,721,961,750 in damages, about $5.72 billion [1].

The jury found Apple infringed claims 17 and 19 of US patent 10,659,885 and claim 16 of US patent 10,820,117 [1].

Both patents, granted to Taction, describe a vibration module that applies tactile sensations to the skin, illustrated in headphones [2]. That is the technology behind haptic feedback.

What it covers

Apple argued the claims were invalid. The jury found it had not proved that, by the clear and convincing evidence the law requires [1].

The jury found the infringement was not willful, for either patent [1]. A finding of willfulness would have allowed the judge to increase the damages.

The case is Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc., in the US District Court for the Southern District of California [1].

What it does not tell you

Which Apple products infringe, or how the jury reached its figure. The verdict form gives only the answers and the total [1].

What Apple will pay. A jury's award can be reduced or overturned by the judge after trial or on appeal; the verdict form says nothing about either [1].

Apple's or Taction's response. The source is the court record alone.

Sources and their grades

  1. US District Court for the Southern District of California, Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 21-cv-00812, Verdict (ECF No. 707). Read 5 October 2026. Grade 1 · Primary The jury's verdict form, filed 25 September 2026; six pages. The copy is hosted by a news agency; the court's own docket is behind PACER.
  2. US Patent and Trademark Office (via Google Patents), US patents 10,659,885 and 10,820,117, Systems and methods for generating damped electromagnetically actuated planar motion for audio-frequency vibrations. Read 5 October 2026. Grade 1 · Primary Grade 1 that the patents were granted to Taction; what they claim to do is the inventor's description. Same title and abstract for both.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under Patents, Phones

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all