News · Rules & courts

A New Mexico jury finds Facebook broke the state's consumer law 43,899,725 times over privacy statements

The judge will set the penalty, up to $5,000 per willful violation. The case grew out of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, and also covered claims about misinformation and hate speech.

Catching up: the original came out on . This story was published later, when the site opened.

43,899,725

violations of New Mexico's consumer law a jury found Facebook committed

Grade 3 · Filed record

Source: New Mexico Department of Justice

What changed
On 25 September a New Mexico jury found Facebook made willfully false or misleading statements about privacy and content moderation, in 43,899,725 violations of state law.
Who it counts
Statements Facebook made to New Mexico consumers about their data, misinformation, hate speech and its response to Cambridge Analytica.
What it does not tell you
The penalty. The judge decides it, up to $5,000 per willful violation, in a later phase; the verdict can also be appealed.

The full story Check the source

A jury in New Mexico found on 25 September that Facebook committed 43,899,725 violations of the state's Unfair Practices Act, the New Mexico Department of Justice said [1].

The jury found that Facebook made willfully false or misleading statements to New Mexico consumers about how it collected, shared and used their personal information, and about its efforts against misinformation and hate speech [1].

What it covers

Among the statements the jury found deceptive, the department says: assurances that users controlled how their information was shared, and that Facebook did not sell or provide personal information to advertisers [1].

The jury also found deceptive Facebook's promises, after the Cambridge Analytica scandal, to investigate apps that had accessed large amounts of user data, audit them and notify affected people [1].

The verdict decides liability only. The judge will set the penalty in a later phase. The law allows up to $5,000 for each willful violation, and the amount is "left entirely to the judge's discretion," the department says [1].

The state is also seeking an injunction to prevent similar practices [1].

What it does not tell you

What Facebook will pay. At the maximum, the penalty would run into the billions of dollars; the judge may set any amount up to that [1].

Facebook's side. The source is the state's own release; it does not say whether Facebook will appeal [1].

Whether this is the same case as New Mexico's child-safety verdict against Meta in March 2026. It is not: that was a separate trial [1].

Sources and their grades

  1. New Mexico Department of Justice, Jury Finds Facebook Violated New Mexico Consumer Protection Law, Faces Billions in Potential Civil Penalties. Read 3 October 2026. Grade 3 · Filed record 25 September 2026. The winning side's account of the verdict, State of New Mexico v. Facebook, Inc.; the verdict form itself was not read.

A grade says how much weight a source will take, from 1 (a body that can compel an answer and has nothing to sell) to 5 (somebody describing what they sell, or themselves). The standard sets out what each grade may be used for.

Filed under Content moderation, Privacy

Comments

Commenting needs an account, made with nothing but an email address. A first comment is read before it appears.

More news

See all